Interviews, captured cleanly.
Candidates notice the recording bot. They watch their words. Notabium runs on your laptop, so the conversation stays natural and the transcript stays usable.
Why bots break interviews
Strong candidates expect to be evaluated. They do not expect to be on display for a third party tool. A visible "Otter.ai" or "Fireflies Notetaker" in the participant list changes the candidate's behaviour. They speak more carefully, dodge harder questions, and ask if they can come back to it after the call.
The result is worse signal for you. The recording you took to improve hiring quality made hiring quality worse.
The Candidate Interview template
- Structured competency signals (technical, communication, collaboration, growth)
- Verbatim quotes for hiring panel review (with timestamps)
- Red flag flags (gaps, contradictions, evasions)
- Cultural fit notes separated from competency notes
- Next steps and the questions the candidate asked you
The template is bias aware. It captures what was said, not your interpretation. Reviewers see the raw signal and can decide for themselves.
Share clips to the hiring panel
Pro tier includes shareable video links. After a screen, drop the link in the hiring channel. Panel reviews at 1.5x with the synced transcript on the right. No more "can you remind me what they said about X?" exchanges. The clip is the answer.
For agency recruiters: white labeled share pages
Pro+ tier removes the Notabium footer from share pages and adds your logo + accent colour. The candidate sees your agency brand, not ours. Useful for video shortlists you send to client hiring managers.
Pricing
Solo recruiter: Pro at $8/mo yearly. Plenty for typical interview volume.
Agency: Team at $20 per seat per month. Shared interview templates ensure every recruiter delivers the same structure to the client.
Related: For founders · vs Otter