Notabium vs Otter.
Otter is the most recognised brand in AI meeting notes. Notabium is the one that does not put a bot in your call. Here is the full comparison, by someone who has used both.
The 60 second answer
- Pick Otter if you live inside a sales CRM that integrates with it, you do not mind a bot showing up in your meetings, and you are comfortable with audio being uploaded to Otter's servers.
- Pick Notabium if you want recording without a bot, you want the audio to stay on your machine, you want to spend $8 per month instead of $17, and you want video share links and bot mode in the same app.
Pricing
| Otter | Notabium | |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | 300 minutes/mo, 30 min/call | unlimited recording + transcription |
| Entry paid | $17/mo (Pro) | $8/mo yearly (Pro) |
| Mid paid | $30/mo (Business) | $16/mo yearly (Pro+) |
| Trial | card required | 14 days, no card |
| Refund | none | 30 days, no questions |
Architecture
Otter is a cloud product. Their bot, Otter Pilot, joins your meeting as a visible participant. The audio is streamed to Otter's servers, processed there, and the transcript is stored on their account system. Their entire business model assumes that data is theirs to process.
Notabium is a desktop product. The app captures audio on your computer. Whisper or Parakeet runs locally. Recordings, transcripts, and summaries live on your laptop unless you explicitly turn on a cloud feature (share links, hosted AI summaries, bot mode). Those three features are opt in per meeting.
The bot question
This is where most people decide. When you use Otter, a bot called Otter.ai or Otter Pilot joins your meeting. It shows up in the participant list. Everyone sees it. Some attendees ask about it. Some refuse to continue. In sales, therapy, legal, and medical conversations, this is a real problem.
Notabium does not add a bot. The app captures the audio your speakers are playing and your microphone is hearing. Zoom, Meet, Teams, and the other person have no way to know Notabium exists. Whether you tell your participants you are recording is a choice you make, not a forced disclosure your tool makes for you.
If you want a bot when you cannot make a meeting, Notabium has that too. Pro+ bot mode schedules a recorder bot via Meeting Baas. It identifies itself in the participant list, never speaks, and delivers the recording to your library after the call.
Feature parity
| Otter | Notabium | |
|---|---|---|
| Live transcription | yes | yes |
| AI summary | yes | yes |
| Bot in meeting | forced | opt in (Pro+) |
| Audio stays on device | no | yes |
| Shareable video links | audio only | video + transcript |
| Local AI summary (no cloud) | no | Qwen3 |
| BYO API key | no | Claude/OpenAI/Groq |
| HIPAA aligned by design | BAA on Enterprise | local processing |
| Open source desktop core | no | based on Meetily (MIT) |
| Mobile app | yes | v2 roadmap |
| Slack / Salesforce integrations | mature | Notion/Obsidian/Linear (Pro) |
Where Otter still wins
Otter has been doing this since 2016. Their mobile app is genuinely good, the live caption rendering is fast, and their CRM integrations (Salesforce, HubSpot) are mature enough that a sales team can stop touching the data manually. If your stack runs on those tools and your customers do not care about the recording bot, Otter remains a fine choice.
Their voice search is also better than ours right now: ask Otter "what did we decide about pricing" and it finds the right clip. We are building that for Notabium with three weeks later search, but Otter shipped it first.
Where Notabium wins
- Half the price. $8 vs $17 at the entry tier.
- No bot by default. Your meetings look like they always did.
- Local first. Audio never leaves your machine unless you opt in.
- Video share links. The Loom workflow inside the meeting tool.
- Bot mode when you want one. Schedule a bot only for meetings you cannot attend.
- Smart templates. Different AI model per meeting type. Standups get Haiku, sales calls get Sonnet, therapy locked to local Qwen3.
How to switch
- Export your Otter transcripts. Otter -> Conversation -> Export -> .txt or .docx (paid feature, batch export not great).
- Download Notabium and grant permissions.
- Drop your Otter exports into Notabium -> File -> Import. They land in your library.
- Record your next meeting in Notabium. Compare.
- Cancel Otter when you are sure. They pro rate the unused term.
FAQ
Is Notabium really an Otter alternative?
For privacy conscious users, freelancers, regulated industries, and anyone tired of the Otter bot in their calls, yes. For large sales teams deeply embedded in Otter's CRM integrations, the answer depends on whether the price and privacy gains outweigh the integration rebuild.
Will my Otter Notion integration still work?
Otter's integration ends when you cancel. Notabium has its own Notion connector. After each meeting, click Send to Notion and the summary lands in the database you pick.
Does Notabium work on iOS or Android?
Not yet. Mobile is on the v2 roadmap. For now, Notabium is macOS and Windows. If mobile is the deal breaker, Otter still wins.
Related: vs Granola · vs Fireflies · vs Loom · vs Fathom